> -----Original Message-----
> From: President, USA Exile Govt. [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: 15 April 2003 15:40
> To: President, USA Exile Govt.
> Cc: email@example.com
> Subject: URGENT: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
> GOVERNMENT OF THE USA IN EXILE
> + Free Americans Reaching Out to Amerika's Huddled Masses +
> April 15, 2003
> Dear Friends and Colleagues,
> What follows is an especially valuable
> compendium of 9-11 information. It probably
> has more long-term value than anything else
> I've ever mailed you.
> I totally agree with the statement below that
> "the break-through point is to inform Americans
> that 9-11 is a big lie."
[Also see this!..
> It seems to me that if we can't convince a
> majority of Americans that 9-11 was a Bush-Junta
> conspiracy, we then stand almost no chance of
> dealing successfully with the Fourth Reich's
> current dreadful momentum.
> The strategy suggested below---joining
> discussions groups, etc.---is a wise one.
> I encourage you to donate as much time
> as you can to this matter.
> Yours for all species,
> Keith Lampe, Ponderosa Pine
> Transition President
> From: "World-Action" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Date: Tue Apr 15, 2003 11:21:48 AM Asia/Bangkok
> To: "[A] WORLD-ACTION" <email@example.com>
> Subject: THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
> Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> A NOTE FROM WORLD-ACTION:
> If you really want to start saving life on Earth,
> join more INTERNET GROUPS and disperse
> information on THE TRUTH OF 9-11 to people
> who don't know. If the truth had come out on
> 9-11, there would be no gross interferences
> with civil liberties in the USA and UK; and NO
> invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
> If you really want to save life on Earth --
> IT IS TIME TO GET DOWN TO SOME WORK:
> INFORM OTHER PEOPLE REGARDING 9-11.
> YAHOO has MILLIONS of discussion/news
> groups to join: http://groups.yahoo.com
> As it is bandied about that most Americans
> supported the attack on Iraq, the break-through
> point is to inform Americans that 9-11 is a big lie.
> So that we stop world conquest and domination
> in its tracks. If people really want to save their
> world, they should join more and more 'discussion
> groups' on the Internet - on ANY subject
> (bee-keeping, car maintenance, etc.) and get
> the members REAL information on 9-11.
> YAHOO has MILLIONS of discussion/news
> groups to join: http://groups.yahoo.com
> This is the simple way to get millions
> more Americans thinking.
> The truth about Sept 11
> The following links are collected by an earth
> citizen, Gerard Holmgren, who wants the truth
> to come out on September 11 events. He doesn't
> have a web site and posts his link on forums,
> to mailing lists. I saved his message in html
> and give it here.
> List of links to documented evidence of high
> level US complicity in the attacks of Sept 11 2001.
> (The Web pages below have been backed up.
> If any links are dead, the backed up page can
> be mailed on request.)
> THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
> Section 1: Airforce stand-down
> 1:1 It has become popular mythology in the
> media that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept
> the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as
> the following research shows.
> Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,
> by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
> 1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story --
> Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
> 1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,
> Research & documentation
> by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
> 1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11, they just
> " arrived late "
> 1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,
> 12 Dec 2001
> 1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
> 1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11
> story impossible
> Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray
> aircraft is a routine procedure. It happened 67
> times in the 10 months between September 2000
> and June 2001.
> 1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.
> Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
> 1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another
> 9/11 Aug 14 2002
> 1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
> 1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
> 1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual
> air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
> So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets
> scrambled, and why has a cover up story been
> In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through
> incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is
> the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
> into car crashes at race tracks.
> Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
> It has become common mythology in the media
> that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary
> School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
> This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where
> he was, and what he knew?
> 2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open
> by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
> This is not the only lie Bush has told about his
> movements that morning. See how many times
> he has changed his story.
> 2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
> by Steve Grey.
> (Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
> 2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.
> A strange press conference. By Jared israel
> and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
> 2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
> White House Cover-up Creates More Problems
> than it Solves -- by Jared Israel and Francisco
> Gil-White [7 October 2002]
> 2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's
> Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
> Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]
> Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.
> Bush is lying about where he was, what he was
> doing and what he knew, during the crucial
> period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
> Why did the President - after being told "America
> is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren
> reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
> cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known
> that at least one more hijacked plane was on the
> loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
> at the top level.
> 2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
> Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers
> If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there
> no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?
> If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
> " innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the
> 3:1 Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
> 3:2 AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
> 3:3 UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
> 3:4 UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)
> If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic
> aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board
> using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate?), why
> did the FBI claim that they were traced through the
> use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own names?
> 3:5 If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched
> before boarding, as claimed in this article
> why is there no airport security footage of them?
> How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,
> guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while
> being searched, but avoiding security cameras
> and not being on the passenger lists?
> What aliases were they alleged to be using when
> they were searched, and if they were not using
> aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
> What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers
> are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
> 3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
> 3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
> 3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
> 3:10 http://www.mujahideen.fsnet.co.uk/wtc/wtc-hijackers.htm
> 3:11 According to this article
> the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to
> subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas
> they would have been affected themselves -
> unless they had masks. The story gets better all
> the time. They somehow got on board with masks,
> gas, guns, knives and electronic guidance systems,
> in spite of being searched, didn't show up on the
> airport security cameras, and were not on the
> passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic
> in rented cars outside the airport (last minute
> brushing up on the way there, about how to fly
> the things!) and then crashed the planes in
> breath taking displays of skilled piloting.
> Just to make sure we knew who they were,
> their passports were conveniently found in
> spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the
> planes and occupants. So they got on board
> with false IDs but used their real passports ?
> If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the
> planes and airport security systems failed due
> to incompetence (not once but 19 times! ), where
> is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
> into racehorse doping scandals.
> Section 4: More oddities
> Why the official story concerning the hijacking of
> AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
> 4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observeršs Cut) American
> Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined By David L. Graham
> Was an urban rescue team sent to New York
> the night before the attacks?
> 4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
> 4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
> 4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects
> official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas
> von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
> National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse
> spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody
> had ever concieved of planes being used in this
> manner, their statements in this article,
> 4:5 Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
> Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
> May 16 2002
> when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,
> quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential
> problem had been recognized for decades.
> And there are other examples of this possibility
> having been widely recognized prior to sept 11.
> 4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
> In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any
> threat had been overwhelmingly perceived as
> being overseas. The statement she made is in
> this press briefing.
> 4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor
> Dr. Condoleezza Rice -- The James S. Brady
> Briefing Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
> But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
> 4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S.
> by Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington
> Post staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
> 4:9 What did happen to Flight 93? by Richrad Wallace.
> The Daily Mirror sept 13, 2002
> 4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm
> Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type
> allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible ?
> Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
> Why is it that the US government doesn't feel
> confident enough of it's case against Bin laden
> to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
> convenient video " confession" tapes ? Probably
> because new video technology makes it impossible
> to distinguish between a real video confession
> and a fake.
> 5:1 When seeing and hearing isn't believing.
> by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
> 5:2 Last word in High Tech trickery. by David
> Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002
> For more detailed evidence of a preplanned
> agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
> 2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
> by Steve Grey.
> (Read the section called "Evidence please !")
> It has become a common myth that Bin Laden
> has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
> 5:3 Bin laden denies terror attacks and points
> finger at jews. Annanova news.
> 5:4 Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks
> holy war. ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
> 5:5 Bin Laden denies being behind attacks.
> JS ONline Milwaukee Jornal Sentinal Sept 16 2001
> 5:6 Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in
> USA were committed by some American terrorist
> group. Pravda Sept 12 2001
> 5:7 Bin laden Denies US attack says paper.
> Middle East News
> 5:8 Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks
> CNN sept 17 2001
> 5:9 Bin Laden denies role in attacks.
> newsday.com Sept 17 2001
> 5:10 Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in
> attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
> Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
> In the first few hours after the attacks, it was
> reported that investigators were already looking
> into huge volumes of insider trading on airline
> stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
> Why has this story since completely disappeared?
> Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that
> more than a year later, they still do not know
> who was responsible? Should not alarm bells
> have been ringing BEFORE the attacks with
> these record volumes of trading?
> If the executive director of the CIA had previously
> managed the firm which handled much of the trade,
> are we seriously expected to believe that he
> doesn't know who was responsible?
> 6:1 Suppresed Details of Criminal Insider
> Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest
> Ranks -- CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard
> Managed Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL,
> by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
> 6:2 Mystery of terror `insider dealers',
> by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
> 6:3 Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11,
> by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert,
> 6 Dec 2001
> Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger
> inquiries into local government contract scandals.
> Section 7: The pentagon frame up
> It is alleged that that American Airlines 77
> (a hijacked Boeing 757) crashed into the Pentagon.
> A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan
> of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make
> an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a
> 35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building
> - and not leave any wreckage outside?
> 7:1 This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
> proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon
> was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon
> attack to have been a self - inflicted frame up.
> 7:2 For a quick overview of the impossibility of the
> official story
> For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
> 7:3 Physical and mathematical analysis of
> Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002
> Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate
> eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding
> AA 77?
> Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts
> examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002
> 7:5 The Pentaogn crash hoax
> Sectrion 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a
> retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been
> planned months before ?
> 8:1 BBC News report by George Arney.
> 8:2 U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida.
> White house given strategy two days before
> Sept 11. NBC news. May 16 2002
> 8:3 US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September
> 11 By David Rennie in Washington
> Why were we originally told that the attack on
> Afghanistan was not planned prior to sept 11,
> and was purely a retaliation to a "surprise"
> attack, and the story then changed after proof
> of the preplanned attack came to light ?
> Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate
> behind the scenes.
> The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin
> Laden so much that they wanted to get him first.
> So why didn't they arrest him when they had
> the chance in July 2001?
> The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment
> at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by
> Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of
> Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
> 9:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
> 9:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
> 9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm
> 9:4 Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked
> away by Michael C. Ruppert
> And why was the Bush family still in business
> with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?
> Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business
> Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate
> Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control
> --Colombian Opium Production Will Soar;
> The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the
> U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its
> Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
> 9:5 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html
> Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
> 9:6 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html
> Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top
> Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne, 5 Mar 2001
> 9:7 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm
> The George W. Bush Money Tree
> 9:8 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm
> 9:9 Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's
> oil companies funded by Bin Laden family and
> wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden,
> by Rick Wiles,Sep 2001
> Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group,
> Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman,
> 10 Jan 2002
> 9:10 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm
> 9:11 Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden
> Story by Jared Israel
> 9:12 BushLaden by Jared Israel
> 9:13 Addition to the above article
> 9:14 Judicial Watch:Bush/Bin Laden connection
> "has now turned into a scandal" Statement from
> Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
> 9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two!
> by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
> 9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had
> business ties with Osama's Brother in Law
> by Michel Chossudovsky 27 december 2002
> And why did the US turn down an offer to
> extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming
> him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
> Section 10: The suspicious collapse
> of the World trade centre Towers.
> How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious
> inquiry? Why was the debris rushed away for
> recycling before any examination could be held?
> 10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics
> by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
> 10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics.
> part 2 by J.McMichael
> "Burning Questions...Need Answers":
> Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for
> Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse,
> 4 Jan 2002
> 10:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm
> 10:6 A firefighter says "we think there
> were bombs set in the building"
> 10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants
> on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty
> and Jared Israel
> 10:8 Documentary footage from the scene
> of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness accounts
> from firefighters at the scene reveal serious
> flaws in the official accounts.
> For a series of engineering articles and
> informative videos on the WTC collapse, see
> 10:9 http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm
> 10:10 Evidence of explosives in South
> WTC Tower collapse
> 10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition
> 10:12 Capter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)
> 10:13 Capter 2 (with comment)
> Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosine)
> burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected
> to believe that burning kerosine towards the top
> of the building (heat travels upwards) somehow
> caused both towers to neatly implode in a
> manner identical to that of a controlled demolition ?
> Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
> into suburban housefires. Why is discussion
> of the possibility of a controlled implosion
> completely taboo? Why do authorities keep
> inventing ridiculous stories about burning
> jet fuel melting steel?
> Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !
> Why were the FBI told to not investigate
> the Bin Laden family links in the US?
> Has someone been sitting on the FBI?
> Transcript of a BBC Newsnight Report on
> "the questionable links of the bin Laden
> Family," 6 Nov 2001
> 11:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html
> 11:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm
> (added comments by Jared Israel)
> Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin
> Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
> 11:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html
> US efforts to make peace summed up by
> `oil', by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
> 11:4 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html
> 11:5 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm
> Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror
> Links Say They Were Told, 'Let Sleeping Dogs Lie'
> By Brian Ross and Vic Walker.
> ABC News Dec 19 2002
> After capuring one of the six most wanted
> Taliban leaders, the US then let him go.
> "By mistake " of course, because of "flawed
> 11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake'
> Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
> 11:8 US accidentally set wanted taliban
> Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.
> 11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright say FBI
> assigned to intelligence operations continue
> to protect terrorists from criminal investigations
> and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002.
> Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
> In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a
> CIA plan to commit terrorist acts against the
> US and frame Cuba.
> Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted
> Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke
> War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
> 12:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
> Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion
> in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
> 12:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
> Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war.
> Comments by Jared Israel.
> 12:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm
> Scanned images of the actual document.
> 12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
> 12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
> 12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
> 12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
> 12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
> 12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
> 12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
> 12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
> 12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
> 12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
> 12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
> 12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
> 12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
> 12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
> 12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
> US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
> 12:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm
> If such tactics were considered normal and
> acceptable practice by the Government in
> 1962, what evidence is there that things have
> Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy
> in 1992
> 12:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html
> as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
> A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW
> STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE? Zbigniew
> Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In
> a 1997 Book - It Is "A Blueprint for World
> Dictatorship," Says a Former German Defense
> and NATO Official Who Warned of Global
> Domination in 1984, in an Exclusive Interview
> With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
> 12:21 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
> Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaeda Network?
> A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror --
> The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet ˇ
> 13:1 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html
> Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of
> mainstream media articles. Compiled by
> Jared Israel
> 13:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
> The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
> 13:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm
> "Articles documenting US creation of taliban
> and Bin Laden's terrorist network" Series of
> links to different articles
> 13:4 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm
> "Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel
> 13:5 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm
> "Bush and the media cover up the Jihad
> schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel
> 13:6 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm
> U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo,
> by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
> 13:7 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html
> Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda?
> Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
> 13:8 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm
> Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
> Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President
> Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
> [Posted 6 October 2001]
> Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits:
> Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington
> 14:1 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm
> Section 15: Why have the President and Vice
> President resisted moves for an inquiry into Sept 11?
> Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes
> CNN Jan 29 2002.
> 15:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/
> Bush,GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry.
> CNN May 17 2002
> 15:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators/
> Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept.
> 11 Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002
> 15:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680
> Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation
> By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm
> 15:4 http://www.mikehersh.com/article_158.shtml
> Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
> Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
> May 16 2002
> 4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
> 15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel.
> CBS News. May 23 2002.
> 15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush.
> White House retreats on independent probe.
> Dana Priest and Dana Milbank.
> Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01
> ABOVE WEBPAGE AT :
> PLEASE FORWARD -- PLEASE FORWARD
Also this!! http://911research.wtc7.net/