Mystical Theology
Dionysius the Areopagite
Note: Bold, red print and brackets [-]
are mine. Dwayne.
THE MYSTICAL THEOLOGY
CHAPTER I
What is the Divine Darkness?
Supernal Triad, Deity above all essence, knowledge and goodness;
Guide of Christians to Divine Wisdom; direct our path to the
ultimate summit of your mystical knowledge, most
incomprehensible, most luminous and most exalted, where the pure,
absolute and immutable mysteries of theology are veiled in the
dazzling obscurity of the secret Silence, outshining all brilliance with
the intensity of their Darkness, and surcharging our blinded
intellects with the utterly impalpable and invisible fairness of glories
surpassing all beauty.
Let this be my prayer; but do, dear Timothy, in the diligent exercise
of mystical contemplation, leave behind the senses and the
operations of the intellect, and all things sensible and intellectual,
and all things in the world of being and nonbeing, that you may
arise by unknowing towards the union, as far as is attainable, with it
that transcends all being and all knowledge.(1) For by the unceasing
and absolute renunciation of yourself and of all things you may be
borne on high, through pure and entire self-abnegation, into the
superessential Radiance of the Divine Darkness [e.g "The Light Shineth out of Darkness].
But these things are not to be disclosed to the uninitiated, by whom I
mean those attached to the objects of human thought, [the image]
and who
-204-
believe there is no superessential Reality beyond, and who imagine
that by their own understanding they know it that has made
Darkness Its secret place. And if the principles of the divine
Mysteries are beyond the understanding of these, what is to be said
of others still more incapable thereof, who describe the
transcendental First Cause of all by characteristics drawn from the
lowest order of beings, while they deny that it is in any way above
the images which they fashion after various designs ["Man has sought out many inventions"]; whereas they
should affirm that, while it possesses all the positive attributes of the
universe (being the Universal Cause) yet, in a more strict sense, it
does not possess them, since it transcends them all; wherefore there
is no contradiction between the affirmations and the negations,
inasmuch as it infinitely precedes all conceptions of deprivation,
being beyond all positive and negative distinctions.
Thus the blessed Bartholomew asserts that the divine science is both
vast and minute, and that the Gospel is great and broad, yet concise
and short; signifying by this, that the beneficent Cause of all is most
eloquent, yet utters few words, or rather is altogether silent [it's a knowing], as
having neither (human) speech nor (human) understanding, because
it is super-essentially exalted above created things, and reveals itself
in Its naked Truth to those alone who pass beyond all that is pure or
impure, and ascend above the topmost altitudes of holy [esoteric or spiritual] things, and
who, leaving behind them all divine light and sound and heavenly
utterances, plunge into the Darkness where truly dwells, as the
Oracles declare, that ONE who is beyond all.(3)
It was not without reason that the blessed Moses was commanded
first to purify himself and them to separate himself from those who
had not undergone purification; and after the entire purification
-205-
heard many trumpets and saw many lights streaming forth with pure
and manifold rays; and that he was thereafter separated from the
multitude, with the elect priests, and pressed forward to the summit
of the divine ascent. Nevertheless, he did not attain to the Presence
of God itself; he saw not it (for it cannot be looked upon) but the
Place where it dwells. And this I take to signify that the divinest and
highest things seen by the eyes or contemplated by the mind are but
the symbolical expressions of those that are immediately beneath it
that is above all. Through these, Its incomprehensible Presence is
manifested upon those heights of Its Holy Places; that then It breaks
forth, even from that which is seen and that which sees, and plunges
the mystic into the Darkness of Unknowing, whence all perfection
of understanding is excluded, and he is enwrapped in that which is
altogether intangible, wholly absorbed in it that is beyond all, and in
none else (whether himself or another); and through the inactivity of
all his reasoning powers is united by his highest faculty to it that is
wholly unknowable; thus by knowing nothing he knows That which
is beyond his knowledge. (4)
CHAPTER II
The necessity of being united with and of rendering praise to it that
is the Cause of all and above all.
We pray that we may come unto this Darkness which is beyond
light, and, without seeing and without knowing, to see and to know
that which is above vision and knowledge through the realization
that by not-seeing [an image] and by unknowing we attain to true vision and
knowledge; and thus praise, superessentially, it that is
-206-
superessential, by the transcendence of all things; even as those
who, carving a statue out of marble, abstract or remove all the
surrounding material [metaphor, swaddling clothes, the veil etc.] that hinders the vision which the marble
conceals and, by that abstraction, bring to light the hidden beauty.(5)
It is necessary to distinguish this negative method of abstraction
from the positive method of affirmation, in which we deal with the
Divine Attributes. For with these latter we begin with the universal
and primary, and pass through the intermediate and secondary to the
particular and ultimate attributes; but now we ascend from the
particular to the universal conceptions, abstracting all attributes in
order that, without veil [flesh], we may know that Unknowing which is
enshrouded under all that is known and all that can be known, and
that we may begin to contemplate the superessential Darkness which
is hidden by all the light that is in existing things.
CHAPTER III
What are the affirmations and the negations concerning God?
In the Theological Outlines (6) we have set forth the principal
affirmative expressions concerning God, and have shown in what
sense God's Holy Nature is One, and in what sense Three; what is
within It which is called Paternity, what Filiation, and what is
signified by the name Spirit; how from the uncreated and indivisible
Good, the blessed and perfect Rays of its Goodness proceed, and
yet abide immutably one both within their Origin and within
themselves and each other, co-eternal with the act by which they
-207-
spring from it; how the superessential Jesus enters in essential state
in which the truths of human nature meet; and other matters made
known by the Oracles are expounded in the same place.
Again, in the treatise on Divine Names, we have considered the
meaning, as concerning God, of the titles of Good, of Being, of
Life, of Wisdom, of Power, and of such other names as are applied
to it [example: third verse ]; further, in Symbolical Theology we have considered what are
the metaphorical titles drawn from the world of sense and applied to
the nature of God; what is meant by the material and intellectual
images we form of it, or the functions and instruments of activity
attributed to it; what are the places where it dwells and the raiment [metaphor's etc.] in
which it is adorned; what is meant by God's anger, grief and
indignation, or the divine inebriation; what is meant by God's oaths
and threats, by Its slumber and waking; and all sacred and
symbolical representations. And it will be observed how far more
copious and diffused are the last terms than the first, for the
theological doctrine and the exposition of the Divine Names are
necessarily more brief than the Symbolical Theology
For the higher we soar in contemplation the more limited become
our expressions of that which is purely intelligible; even as now,
when plunging into the Darkness that is above the intellect, we pass
not merely into brevity of speech, but even into absolute silence of
thoughts and of words. Thus, in the former discourse, our
contemplations descended from the highest to the lowest, embracing
an ever-widening number of conceptions [the "appearent" contradictions], which increased at each
stage of the descent; but in the present discourse we mount upwards
from below to that which is the highest, and, according to the degree
of transcendence, so our speech is restrained until, the entire ascent
being accomplished, we become wholly voiceless, inasmuch as we
are absorbed in it that is totally ineffable. But why, you will ask,
-208-
'does the affirmative method begin from the highest attributions, and
the negative method with the lowest abstractions?' The reason is
because, when affirming the subsistence of That which transcends
all affirmation, we necessarily start from the attributes most closely
related to It [imagery] and upon which the remaining affirmations [peripherals] depend; but
when pursuing the negative method to reach That which is beyond
all abstraction, we must begin by applying our negations to things
which are most remote from It.
For is it not more true to affirm that God is Life and Goodness than
that God is air or stone; and must we not deny to God more
emphatically the attributes of inebriation and wrath than the
applications of human speech and thought?
CHAPTER IV
That it that is the pre-eminent Cause of all things sensibly perceived
is not itself any of those things. [changes under observation. Quantum
physics]
We therefore maintain that the universal and transcendent Cause of
all things is neither without being nor without life, nor without
reason or intelligence; nor is it a body, nor has it form or shape,
quality, quantity or weight; nor has it any localized, visible or
tangible existence; it is not sensible or perceptible; nor is it subject to
any disorder or inordination nor influenced by any earthly passion;
neither is it rendered impotent through the effects of material causes
and events; it needs no light; it suffers no change, corruption,
division, privation or flux; none of these things can either be
identified with or attributed unto it.
-209-
CHAPTER V
That that is the pre-eminent Cause of all things intelligibly
perceived is not itself any of those things. [Maya - the illusion.
Quantum physics again]
Again, ascending yet higher, we maintain that it is neither soul nor
intellect; nor has it imagination, opinion reason or understanding;
nor can it be expressed or conceived, since it is neither number nor
order; nor greatness nor smallness; nor equality nor inequality; nor
similarity nor dissimilarity; neither is it standing, nor moving, nor at
rest; neither has it power nor is power, nor is light; neither does it
live nor is it life; neither is it essence, nor eternity nor time; nor is it
subject to intelligible contact; nor is it science nor truth, nor kingship
nor wisdom; neither one nor oneness, nor godhead nor goodness;
nor is it spirit according to our understanding, nor filiation, nor
paternity; nor anything else known to us or to any other beings of
the things that are [the 'image'] or the things that are not; neither does anything
that is know it as it is; nor does it know existing things according to
existing knowledge; neither can the reason attain to it, nor name it,
nor know it; neither is it darkness nor light, nor the false nor the
true; nor can any affirmation or negation be applied to it, for
although we may affirm or deny the things below it, we can neither
affirm nor deny it, inasmuch as the all-perfect and unique Cause of
all things transcends all affirmation, and the simple pre-eminence of
Its absolute nature is outside of every negation- free from every
limitation [story] and beyond them all. [there is nothing that is not God.
All things exist in its non-existence]
-210-
NOTES:
(1) Unknowing, or agnosia, is not ignorance or nescience as
ordinarily understood, but rather the realization that no finite
knowledge can fully know the Infinite One, and that therefore it is
only truly to be approached by agnosia, or by that which is beyond
and above knowledge [which surpasses all understanding]. There are two main kinds of darkness: the subdarkness and the super-darkness, between which lies, as it were, an octave of light. But the nether-darkness and the Divine Darkness
are not the same darkness, for the former is absence of light, while
the latter is excess of light. The one symbolizes mere ignorance, and
the other a transcendent unknowing - a super knowledge not
obtained by means of the discursive reason.
(2) 'Of the First Principle,' says Damascius, 'the ancient Egyptians
said nothing, but celebrated it as a Darkness beyond all intellectual
or spiritual perception - a Thrice-unknown Darkness.' This is for
ever about the Pavilions of that great Light Unapproachable. It is
caused by the superabundance of Light and not by the absence of
lumination: it is 'a deep but dazzling Darkness' (Henry Vaughan).
'The light shineth in the darkness' (St. John, 1, 5). 'In Thy light we
shall see light' (Psalm 36, 9).
(3)St. John of the Cross, for instance, wrote of other kinds of
darkness; for example, the darkness of the night of purgation, and
the dark night of the soul, but the Divine Darkness is in a different
category from these [as is penned by Paul: 'For if the truth of God {the
Word} hath more abounded through my lie - darkness - unto his glory'....etc..].
(4) Particularly important here is the concept of beyond-being, the
recognition that what is known in the unknowing is beyond the
realm of being and cannot be adequately described, although
negation comes closer than affirmation.
-211-
(5) Compare the well-known analogy of Plotinus:
'Withdraw into yourself and look; and if you do not find yourself
beautiful as yet, do as does the sculptor of a statue ... cut away all
that is excessive, straighten all that is crooked, bring light to all that
is shadowed ... do not cease until there shall shine out on you the
Godlike Splendour of Beauty; until you see temperance surely
established in the stainless shrine-(Ennead, 1, 6, 9).
(6) Dionysius refers to several of his treatises, but besides the
Mystical Theology the other extant works of his are Divine Names,
The Celestial Hierarchies, Ecclesiastical Hierarchy, and various
epistles. See The Complete Works, Colm Luibheid, trs., (Paulist
Press: 1987), now, unfortunately, out of print.
Click 7 to continue..................................................................................*
****