Bar Association History & Who Owns
the U.S.
History of "BAR ASSOCIATIONS" The Crown Temple
Secret Society of the Third Way Order by Rule of Mystery Babylon. The Templars
of the Crown. The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of
America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the
"Crown," which is a private foreign power.
Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or
the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different
"Crown" and is fully exposed and explained below. We are specifically
referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as
the "Crown."
This Temple "Church" is outside any Canonical
jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by
sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution. All licensed Bar
Attorneys - Attorners (see definitions below) in the U.S. owe their
allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing
this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout
the world are signatories and franchises to the International Bar Association
located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at
Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London.
Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in
the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California
Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown. The Inns of Court (see below, The
Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of
the City of London - a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part
of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800's, is
not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce,
and manipulate the American people.
These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing
crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal
and lawful below). They are known collectively as the "Crown." Their
lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers. The present Queen of
England is not the "Crown," as we have all been led to believe.
Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or
Crown Temple.
The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling
sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of
the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in
Chancery. The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal
government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the
Crown Temple through its bankers and attornies.
The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private
foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawn broker. The
bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance
to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at
Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the
independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent
"legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people.
The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry
out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary. Since the first
Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new
ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple
Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded
that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta.
This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the
Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which
became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar,
Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their
origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity
(chancery) contracts. "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for
ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but
are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." -Matthew
23:27
By what authority has the "Crown" usurped the
natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S.
Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be
considered in any manner as being "constitutional" when this same
Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S.
Government? Is it any wonder the states and her people have no justice as they
dwell upon the land? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs
to the Crown Temple. The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by
the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London.
The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S.
Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from
Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations,
the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most
importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his
Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland.
The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland
controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules
the world. Definitions You Never Knew:
ATTORN [e-'tern] Anglo-French aturner to transfer
(allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French atorner to turn (to),
arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new
landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996.
ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage
and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or
tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
ESQUIRE, n. [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which
shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an
attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree
below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen,
to officers of the king's courts and of the household, to counselors at law,
justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In
the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from
governors down to justices and attorneys. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
RULE, n. [L. regula, from rego, to govern, that is, to
stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme
command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or
regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster's
1828 Dictionary RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.)
a regulation.
REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be
done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of
human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999. CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding
the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the
keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behavior. 3 [C] a formal
group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.)
to encode.
ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols.
-Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine,
F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by
walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4. A flag; an ensign; -- in contempt. [Obs.]
Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster's Revised
Unabridged Dictionary.
COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or
sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or
emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster's 1828
Dictionary. COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others.
-The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames,
which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their
denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near
the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in
honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity,
and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open
places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of
court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of the knights Templars. They
are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or
castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently
assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where
the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to
the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.
INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In
England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly,
the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which
he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students
of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle
Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young
students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by
attorneys, solicitors, etc.
INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than
something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace.
-Webster's 1828 Dictionary. CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion;
sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself.
Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown;
hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. -- Crown land, land
belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. -- Crown law, the law which
governs criminal prosecutions. -- Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in
criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to
invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged
Dictionary.
COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of
people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to
cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the
parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish
colonies in South America. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the
circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be
internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to
other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb,
std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable
that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1.In a general
sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in
general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political
body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State. ESTATE,
v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster's 1828 Dictionary.
PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3.
Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing
given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to
some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the
king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises. PATENT, v.t. To grant
by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person.
LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according
to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. "Lawful"
properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; "Legal", a
thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or
warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a "legal"
process however defective. A Dictionary of Law 1893.
LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the
exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the
legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in
law. Opposed to actual. "Legal" looks more to the letter, and
"Lawful" to the spirit, of the law. "Legal" is more
appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; "Lawful" for
accord with ethical principle. "Legal" imports rather that the forms
of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules
prescribed have been obeyed; "Lawful" that the right is actful in
substance, that moral quality is secured. "Legal" is the antithesis of
"equitable", and the equivalent of "constructive". - 2
Abbott's Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).
STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state
in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when,
on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left
in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary
The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple Globally, all
the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and
their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the
Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln's Inn, and Gray's Inn. These
Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world
power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the
early 1200's.
The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members
of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray's Inn specializes in Taxation
legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln's Inn received its name from
the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300). Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar
Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated - for a
definite and purposeful reason: You can't make claim against a non-entity and a
non-being. They are private societies without charters or statutes, and their
so-called constitutions are based solely on custom and self-regulation. In other
words, they exist as secret societies without a public "front door"
unless you're a private member called to their Bar.
While the Inner Temple holds the legal system franchise by
license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has
legal license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar
Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through
the Crown Temple. From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written
by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the
Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America: "Call to
the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at
King's Inns until late in the 19th century.
In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the
American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn's records
would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in
Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration
of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its
consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812". All
Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the
Crown Temple in order to be accepted or "called to Bar" at any of the
King's Inns.
Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the
Crown Temple. It's a real eye opener to know that the Middle Inn of the Crown
Temple has publicly acknowledged there were at least five Templar Bar Attornies,
under solemn oath only to the Crown, who signed what was alleged to be an
American Declaration of Independence. This simply means that both parties to the
Declaration agreement were of the same origin, the Crown Temple. In case you
don't understand the importance of this, there is no international agreement or
treaty that will ever be honored, or will ever have lawful effect, when the same
party signs as both the first and second parties. It's merely a worthless piece
of paper with no lawful authority when both sides to any agreement are actually
the same. In reality, the American Declaration of Independence was nothing more
than an internal memo of the Crown Temple made among its private members.
By example, Alexander Hamilton was one of those numerous
Crown Templars who was called to their Bar. In 1774, he entered King's College
in New York City, which was funded by members of the London King's Inns, now
named Columbia University. In 1777, he became a personal aide and private
secretary to George Washington during the American Revolution. In May of 1782,
Hamilton began studying law in Albany, New York, and within six months had
completed a three year course of studies, passed his examinations, and was
admitted to the New York Bar.
Of course, the New York Bar Association was/is a franchise
of the Crown Temple through the Middle Inn. After a year's service in Congress
during the 1782-1783 session, he settled down to legal practice in New York City
as Alexander Hamilton, Esqr. In February of 1784, he wrote the charter for, and
became a founding member of, the Bank of New York, the State's first bank. He
secured a place on the New York delegation to the Federal Convention of 1787 at
Philadelphia. In a five hour speech on June 18th, he stated "an Executive
for life will be an elective Monarch". When all his anti-Federalist New
York colleagues withdrew from the Convention in protest, he alone signed the
Constitution for the United States of America representing New York State, one
of the legal Crown States (Colonies).
One should particularly notice that a lawful state is made
up of the people, but a State is a legal entity of the Crown - a Crown Colony.
This is an example of the deceptive ways the Crown Temple - Middle Templars -
have taken control of America since the beginning of our settlements. This is
explained in further detail below.
Later, as President Washington's U.S. Treasury Secretary,
Hamilton alone laid the foundation of the first Federal U.S. Central Bank,
secured credit loans through Crown banks in France and the Netherlands, and
increased the power of the Federal Government over the hoodwinked nation-states
of the Union. Hamilton had never made a secret of the fact that he admired the
government and fiscal policies of Great Britain. Americans were fooled into
believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent
nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are
Colonies of the Crown Temple, through letters patent and charters, who have no
legal authority to be independent from the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple. A
legal State is a Crown Temple Colony. Neither the American people nor the Queen
of Britain own America.
The Crown Temple owns America through the deception of
those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Templar Bar. The
Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attornies Rule America through unlawful
contracts, unlawful taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt
deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but
"legal", Orders, Rules and Codes of the Crown Temple Courts, our This
is because the Crown Temple holds the land titles and estate also-called
"judiciary" in America.deeds to all of North America.
The biggest lie is what the Crown and its agents refer to
as "the rule of law". In reality, it is not about law at all, but
solely about the Crown Rule of all nations. For example, just read what
President Bush stated on November 13, 2001, regarding the "rule of
law:" "Our countries are embarked on a new relationship for the 21st
century, founded on a commitment to the values of democracy, the free market,
and the rule of law."- Joint Statement by President George W. Bush and
President Vladimir V. Putin on 11/13/01, spoken from the White House, Washington
D.C.
What happened in 1776? "Whoever owns the soil, owns
all the way to the heavens and to the depths of the earth." - Old Latin
maxim and Roman expression. 1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for
all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States.
The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed
on both sides by representatives of the Crown Temple. Legally, it announced the
status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called
"States" as direct possessive estates of the Crown (see the
definitions above to understand the legal trickery that was done).
The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were
declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the Colonies are still
in Crown possession is the use of the word "State" to signify a
"legal estate of possession." Had this been a document of and by the
people, both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution would
have been written using the word "states". By the use of
"State," the significance of a government of estate possession was
legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar
possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both
parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of
America.
All "Constitutional Rights" in America are simply
those dictated by the Crown Temple and enforced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar
Attorners) through their franchise and corporate government entity, the federal
United States Government. When a "State Citizen" attempts to invoke
his "constitutional", natural, or common law "rights" in
Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don't apply. Why? Simply because a
State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown
"law".
Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by
the paramount authority of God's Law. The people who comprise the citizenry of a
state are recognized only within natural and common law as is already
established by God's Law. Only a State Citizen can be a party to an action
within a State Court. A common state citizen cannot be recognized in that court
because he doesn't legally exist in Crown Chancery Courts. In order to be
recognized in their State Courts, the common man must be converted to that of a
corporate or legal entity (a legal fiction).
Now you know why they create such an entity using all
capital letters within Birth Certificates issued by the State. They convert the
common lawful man of God into a fictional legal entity subject to Administration
by State Rules, Orders and Codes (there is no "law" within any Rule or
Code). Of course, Rules, Codes, etc. do not apply to the lawful common man of
the Lord of lords, so the man with inherent Godly law and rights must be
converted into a legal "Person" of fictional "status"
(another legal term) in order for their legal - but completely unlawful
State Judiciary (Chancery Courts) to have authority over him. Chancery Courts
are tribunal courts where the decisions of "justice" are decided by 3
"judges". This is a direct result of the Crown Temple having invoked
their Rule and Code over all judicial courts. "It is held to be a settled
Rule, that our courts can not take notice of any title to land not derived from
the State or Colonial government, and duly verified by patent." -4 Johns.
Rep. 163. Jackson v. Waters, 12 Johns. Rep. 365. S.P.
The Crown Temple was granted Letters Patent (see definition
above) and Charters (definition below) for all the land (Colonies) of New
England by the King of England, a sworn member of the Middle Temple (as the
Queen is now). Since the people were giving the patent/charter corporations and
Colonial Governours such a hard time, especially concerning Crown taxation, a
scheme was devised to allow the Americans to believe they were being granted
"independence." Remember, the Crown Templars represented both parties
to the 1776 Declaration of Independence; and, as we are about to see, the latter
1787 U.S. Constitution.
To have this "Declaration" recognized by
international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity
of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the
Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, "between the Crown of Great Britain
and the said United States". The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then
and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the
corporate "United States", the new Crown Temple States (Colonies).
Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the
Treaty of Paris were. Take particular note to the abbreviation "Esqr."
following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally
signifies "Officers of the King's Courts", which we now know were
Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title given to
Alexander Hamilton (see above).
The Crown was represented in signature by "David
Hartley, Esqr.", a Middle Templar of the King's Court. Representing the
United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was "John Adams, Esqr",
"Benjamin Franklin, Esqr." and "John Jay, Esqr." The
signatories for the "United States" were also Middle Templars of the
King's Court through Bar Association membership.
What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that
the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect
and elaborate scam the people of North America had pulled on them! It becomes
even more obvious when you read Article 5, which states in part, "to
provide for the Restitution of all Estates, Rights, and Properties which have
been confiscated, belonging to real British Subjects."
The Crown Colonies were granted to "persons" and
corporations of the Crown Temple through Letters Patent and Charters, and the
North American Colonial land was owned by the Crown. Since 1883, the Crown has
been receiving "restitution" from the United States, their
incorporated Crown franchisee, because the Crown owns the land through paramount
and allodial title as a possessory estate. Now, here's a real catch-all in
Article 4: "It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no
lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all
bona fide debts heretofore contracted."
Since the Crown and its Templars represented both the
United States, as the debtors, and the Crown, as the creditors, then they became
the creditor of the American people by owning all debts of the former Colonies,
now called the legal Crown States. This sounds too good to be true, but these
are the facts. The words SCAM and HOODWINKED can't begin to describe what had
taken place.
So then, what debts were owed to the Crown Temple and their
banks as of 1883? In the Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United
States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782, Article I states,
"It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the
Congress of the United States under the title of a loan, in the years 1778,
1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of
livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the
above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full
powers, to wit." That amount equals about $18 million dollars, plus
interest, that Hamilton's U.S. Central Bank owed the Crown through Crown Bank
loans in France. This was signed, on behalf of the United States, by an already
familiar Middle Templar, Benjamin Franklin, Esquire. An additional $6 million
dollars (six million livres) was loaned to the United States at 5% interest by
the same parties in a similar Contract signed on February 25, 1783. The Crown
Bankers in the Netherlands and France were calling in their debts for payment by
future generations of Americans.
The Fiscal Agents of Mystery Babylon Since its beginnings,
the Temple Church at the City of London has been a Knight Templar secret
society. It was built and established by the same Temple Knights who were given
their Rule and Order by the Roman Pope. It's very important to know how the
British Royal Crown was placed into the hands of the Knights Templars, and how
the Crown Templars became the fiscal and military agents for the Pope of the
Roman Church. This all becomes very clear through the Concession Of England To
The Pope on May 15, 1213. This charter was sworn in fealty by England's King
John to Pope Innocent and the Roman Church. It was witnessed before the Crown
Templars, as King John stated upon sealing the same, "I myself bearing
witness in the house of the Knights Templars."
Pay particular attention to the words being used that we
have defined below, especially charter, fealty, demur, and concession: We wish
it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal,
not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous
will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God
and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church,
and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom
of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and
appurtenances. We perform and swear fealty for them to him our aforesaid lord
pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, binding our
successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform
fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to
the Roman church without demur. As a sign. we will and establish perpetual obli
gation and concession from the proper and especial revenues
of our aforesaid kingdoms. The Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand
marks sterling, saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia;
all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have
perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act
counter to them. And if we or any one of our successors shall presume to attempt
this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his
senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our
obligation and concession shall always remain firm.
Most who have commented on this charter only emphasize the
payments due the Pope and the Roman Church. What should be emphasized is the
fact that King John broke the terms of this charter by signing the Magna Carta
on June 15, 1215. Remember; the penalty for breaking the 1213 agreement was the
loss of the Crown (right to the kingdom) to the Pope and his Roman Church. It
says so quite plainly.
To formally and lawfully take the Crown from the royal
monarchs of England by an act of declaration, on August 24, 1215, Pope Innocent
III annulled the Magna Carta; later in the year, he placed an Interdict
(prohibition) on the entire British empire. From that time until today, the
English monarchy and the entire British Crown belonged to the Pope. The
following definitions are all taken from Webster's 1828 Dictionary since the
meanings have not been perverted for nearly 200 years:
FEALTY, n. [L. fidelis.] Fidelity to a lord; faithful
adherence of a tenant or vassal to the superior of whom he holds his lands;
loyalty.Under the feudal system of tenures, every vassal or tenant was bound to
be true and faithful to his lord, and to defend him against all his enemies.
This obligation was called his fidelity or fealty, and an oath of fealty was
required to be taken by all tenants to their landlords. The tenant was called a
liege man; the land, a liege fee; and the superior, liege lord.
FEE, n. [In English, is loan]. This word, fee, inland, or
an estate in trust, originated among the descendants of the northern conquerors
of Italy, but it originated in the south of Europe. See Feud.] Primarily, a loan
of land, an estate in trust, granted by a prince or lord, to be held by the
grantee on condition of personal service, or other condition; and if the grantee
or tenant failed to perform the conditions, the land reverted to the lord or
donor, called the landlord, or lend-lord, the lord of the loan.
A fee then is any land or tenement held of a superior on
certain conditions. It is synonymous with fief and feud. In the United States,
an estate in fee or fee simple is what is called in English law an allodial
estate, an estate held by a person in his own right, and descendible to the
heirs in general.
FEUD, n. [L. fides; Eng. loan.] A fief; a fee; a right to
lands or hereditaments held in trust, or on the terms of performing certain
conditions; the right which a vassal or tenant has to the lands or other
immovable thing of his lord, to use the same and take the profits thereof
hereditarily, rendering to his superior such duties and services as belong to
military tenure, &c., the property of the soil always remaining in the lord
or superior.
By swearing to the 1213 Charter in fealty, King John
declared that the British- English Crown and its possessions at that time,
including all future possessions, estates, trusts, charters, letters patent, and
land, were forever bound to the Pope and the Roman Church, the landlord. Some
five hundred years later, the New England Colonies in America became a part of
the Crown as a possession and trust named the "United States."
ATTORNING, ppr. Acknowledging a new lord, or transferring
homage and fealty to the purchaser of an estate.
CHARTER, n. 1. A written instrument, executed with usual
forms, given as evidence of a grant, contract, or whatever is done between man
and man. In its more usual sense, it is the instrument of a grant conferring
powers, rights and privileges, either from a king or other sovereign power, or
from a private person, as a charter of exemption, that no person shall be
empanelled on a jury, a charter of pardon, &c.
The charters under which most of the colonies in America
were settled, were given by the king of England, and incorporated certain
persons, with powers to hold the lands granted, to establish a government, and
make laws for their own regulation. These were called charter- governments. By
agreeing to the Magna Carta, King John had broken the agreement terms of his
fealty with Rome and the Pope. What that means is that he lost all rights to the
kingdom, and the royal English Crown was turned over by default to the Pope and
the Roman Church. The Pope and his Roman Church control the Crown Temple because
his Knights established it under his Orders. So also the Temple Banks, the
Templar Attorneys, the corporate United States, the corporate British
Commonwealth, the chartered Federal Reserve Bank and Bank of England; the list
is nearly endless. He who controls the gold controls the world. The Crown Temple
Today The workings of the Crown Temple in this day and age is moreso obvious,
The Crown Templars have many names and many symbols to
signify their private and unholy Temple. Take a close look at the (alleged) one
dollar $1 private Federal Reserve System (a Crown banking franchise) Debt Note.
Notice in the base of the pyramid the Roman date MDCCLXXVI which is written in
Roman numerals for the year 1776. The words ANNUIT COEPTIS NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM
are Roman Latin for ANNOUNCING THE BIRTH OF THE NEW ORDER OF THE WORLD. Go back
to the definitions above and pay particular attention to the words CAPITOL,
CROWN and TEMPLE.
1776 signifies the birth of the New World Order under the
Crown Temple. That's when their American Crown Colonies became the chartered
government called the United States, thanks to the Declaration of Independence.
Since that date, the United Nations (another legal Crown Temple by charter) rose
up and refers to every nation as a State member. Note also that there are 13
layers for the pyramid denoting the 13 chartered Colony-States and that the eye
of Osirus, one of many Templar signs used the Temple Illuminati or their Order
of the Rose and Order of the Cross.
The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple This is not a mere
child's story written by L. Frank Baum. What symbol does "Oz" stand
for? Ounces. What is measured in ounces? Gold. What is the yellow brick road?
Bricks or ingot bars of gold.
What about the Tin Man? Does Taxpayer Identification Number
(TIN) mean anything to you? The poor TIN Man just stood there mindlessly doing
his work until his body literally froze up and stopped functioning. He worked
himself to death because he had no heart nor soul. He's the heartless and
emotionless creature robotically carrying out his daily task as if he was
already dead. He's the ox pulling the plow and the mule toiling under the yoke.
These days, his task masters just oil him nightly with beer and place him in
front of a hypnotic television until his very existence no longer has any
meaning or value. His masters keep him cold on the outside and heartless on the
inside in order to control any emotions or heart he may get a hold of. The
pitiful Cowardly Lion was always too frightened to stand up for himself. Of
course, he was a bully and a big mouth when it came to picking on those smaller
than he was. Did you ever notice how bullies are really the biggest cowards?
They act as if they have great courage, but they really have none at all. All
roar with no teeth of authority to back them up. When push came to shove, the
Cowardly Lion always buckled under and whimpered when anyone of any size or
stature challenged him. He wanted courage from the Grand Wizard, so he was
awarded a medal of "official" recognition. Now, regardless of how much
of a coward he still was, his official status made him a bully with officially
recognized authority. He's just like the Attorneys who hide behind the Middle
Courts of the Temple Bar.
What about the trip through the field of poppies? Notice
how it never affected the Straw Man (no brain) or the TIN Man (no heart or
soul)? They weren't real people, so drugs had no effect on them. The Wizard of
Oz was written at the turn of the century, so how could the author have known
America was going to be drugged? The Crown has been playing the drug cartel game
for centuries. Just look up the history of Hong Kong and the Opium Wars. The
Crown already had valuable experience conquering all of China with drugs, so why
not the rest of the world?
Who finally exposed the Wizard for what he really was?
Toto, the ugly (or cute, depending on your perspective) and somewhat annoying
little dog. Toto means "in total, all together; Latin in toto." Notice
how Toto was not scared of the Great Wizard's theatrics, yet he was so small in
size compared to the Wizard, no-one seemed to notice him. The smoke, flames and
hologram images were designed to frighten people into doing as the Great Wizard
of Oz commanded. Toto simply went over, looked behind the curtain the court
- (see the definition for curtain above), saw it was a scam, and started barking
until others paid attention to him and came to see what all the barking was
about.
Who was behind the curtain? Just an ordinary person
controlling the levers that created the illusions of the Great Wizard's power
and authority. When Toto pulled back the curtain to completely expose him, the
charade was over. The veil hiding the corporate legal fiction and its false
courts was removed. The Wizard's game was up. It's too bad that people don't
realize how loud a bark from a little dog is. How about your bark?
Do you just remain silent and wait to be given whatever
food and recognition, if any, your legal master gives you? Let's not forget
those pesky flying monkeys. What a perfect mythical creature to symbolize the
Bar Association Attorners who attack and control all the little people for the
Great Crown Wizard, the powerful and grand Bankers of Oz - Gold. What is it
going to take to expose the Wizard and tear down the court veil for what they
really are? Each of us needs only a brain, a heart and soul, and courage. Then,
and most importantly, we all need to learn how to work together. Only "in
toto," working together as one Body of the King of Kings, can we ever be
free or have the freedom given under God's Law.
Mystery Babylon Revealed. There is no mystery behind the
current abomination of Babylon for those who discern His Truth: And upon her
forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS
AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. -Revelation 17:5 God has reserved His judgment
for the great idolatress, Rome, the chief seat of all idolatry, that rules over
many nations with whom the kings have committed to the worship of her idols (see
Revelation 17:1-4). The Pope and His purported Church; sitting on the Temple
throne at the Vatican; ruling the nations of the earth through the Crown Temple
of ungodly deities are the Rule and Order of Babylon; the Crown of godlessness
and the Code of commerce.
One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The
New World Order (a Bush family favourite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair
and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United
Nations, the EU, the US, or many dozens of other names. However, they all point
to one origin and one beginning.
We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the
Temple Church circa 1200. All world banking, judiciary, and rule of
"law" has been under the Rule and Order of the Crown Temple since that
time. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand
Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple Church in the
sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the
world. "And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked
with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full
of abominations and filthiness of her fornication" -Revelation 17:4 This
verse appears to be an accurate description of the Pope and His Bishops for the
past 1,700 years. The idolatries of commerce in the world: all the gold and
silver; the iron and soft metals; the money and coins and riches of the world:
All of these are under the control of the Crown Temple; the Roman King and his
false Church; the throne of
Babylon; attended to by his Templar Knights, the Wizards of
abomination and idolatry. "The seven heads are seven mountains, on which
the woman [mother of harlots] sitteth" - Revelation 17:9 The only mention
of "seven mountains" within our present-day Bible is at Revelation
17:9, so it's no wonder this has been a mystery to the current Body of Christ.
The 1611 King James (who was a Crown Templar) Bible is not
the entire canon of the early church ("church" in Latin ecclesia; in
Greek ekklesia). There were other gospels and books that have been forbidden by
the Papal Throne at Rome since the third century. Greek and Aramaic copies of
the "unapproved writings" were sought after and destroyed by Rome.
This in itself is no mystery as history records the existence and destruction of
these early church writings; just as history has now proven their genuine
authenticity with the appearance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and the coptic library
at Nag Hagmadi in Egypt, among many other recent Greek language discoveries
within the past 100 years.
The current Holy Bible quotes the Book of Enoch numerous
times: By faith Enoch was taken away so that he did not see death, "and was
not found, because God had taken him"; for before he was taken he had this
testimony, that he pleased God. - Hebrews 11:5 Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam,
prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten
thousands of His saints, to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are
ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an
ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken
against Him." - Jude 1:14-15.
The Book of Enoch was considered scripture by most early
Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers"
is filled with references to this mysterious book. The second century Epistle of
Barnabus makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century
"Church Fathers," such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement
of Alexandria, all make use of the Book of Enoch. Tertullian (160-230 C.E) even
called the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church
included the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read
the first three centuries after Christ. However, this and many other books
became discredited after the Roman Council of Laodicea. Being under ban of the
Roman Papal authorities, afterwards they gradually passed out of circulation.
At about the time of the Protestant Reformation, there was
a renewed interest in the Book of Enoch, which had long since been lost to the
modern world. By the late 1400's, rumors began to spread that a copy of the long
lost Book of Enoch might still exist. During this time, many books arose
claiming to be the lost book but were later found to be forgeries. The return of
the Book of Enoch to the modern western world is credited to the famous explorer
James Bruce, who in 1773 returned from six years in Abyssinia with three
Ethiopic copies of the lost book. In 1821, Richard Laurence published the first
English translation. The now famous R.H. Charles edition was first published by
Oxford Press in 1912. In the following years, several portions of the Greek text
also surfaced. Then, with the discovery of cave number four of the Dead Sea
Scrolls, seven fragmentary copies of the Aramaic text were discovered.
Within the Book of Enoch is revealed one of the mysteries
of Babylon concerning the seven mountains she sits upon (underlining has been
added): [CHAPTER 52] 2 There mine eyes saw all the secret things of heaven that
shall be; a mountain of iron, a mountain of copper, a mountain of silver, a
mountain of gold, a mountain of soft metal, and a mountain of lead. 6 These [6]
mountains which thine eyes have seen: The mountain of iron, the mountain of
copper, the mountain of silver, the mountain of gold, the mountain of soft
metal, and the mountain of lead. All these shall be in the presence of the Elect
One as wax: Before the fire, like the water which streams down from above upon
those mountains, and they shall become powerless before his feet. 7 It shall
come to pass in those days that none shall be saved, either by gold or by
silver, and none be able to escape. 8 There shall be no iron for war, nor shall
one clothe oneself with a breastplate. Bronze shall be of no service, (tin sh) ?
all be of no service and shall not be esteemed, and lead
shall not be desired. 9 All these things shall be denied and destroyed from the
surface of the earth when the Elect One shall appear before the face of the Lord
of Spirits.' [CHAPTER 24] 3 The seventh mountain was in the midst of these, and
it excelled them in height, resembling the seat of a throne; and fragrant trees
encircled the throne. [CHAPTER 25] 3 And he answered saying: 'This high mountain
which thou hast seen, whose summit is like the throne of God, is His throne,
where the Holy Great One, the Lord of Glory, the Eternal King, will sit, when He
shall come down to visit the earth with goodness. 4 As for this fragrant tree,
no mortal is permitted to touch it until the great judgment when He shall take
vengeance on all and bring (everything) to its consummation for ever. 5 It shall
then be given to the righteous and Holy. Its fruit shall be for food to the
elect: It shall be transplanted to the Holy place, to the temple of the Lord,
the Eternal King. 6 Then shall they rejoice with joy and be glad, and into the
Holy place shall they enter; its fragrance shall be in their bones and they
shall live a long life on earth, such as thy fathers lived: In their days shall
no sorrow, or plague, or torment, or calamity touch them.'
The present wealth and power of all the world's gold,
silver, tin, bronze, pearls, diamonds, gemstones, iron, and copper belonging the
Babylon whore, and held in the treasuries of her Crown Templar banks and deep
stony vaults, will not be able to save them at the time of the Lord's judgment.
But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom
of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them
that are entering to go in. Matthew 23:13
Where do we go from here? Now that their false Temple has
been exposed, how does this apply to the Kingdom of Heaven? To reach the end,
you must know the beginning. For everything ordained of God, there is an
imitation ordained of evil that looks like the genuine thing. There is the
knowledge of good and the knowledge of evil. The problem is, most believe they
have the knowledge of God when what they really have is knowledge of world
deceptions operating as gods. Where there is the true Tabernacle or Temple of
God, there are also the false Temples of unholy gods. The only way to discern
and begin to understand the Kingdom of Heaven is to seek the Knowledge that
comes only from God, not the knowledge of men who take their legal claim as
earthly rulers and gods.
The false Crown Temple and its Grand Wizard Knights have
led the world to believe that they are of the Lord God and hold the knowledge
and keys to His Kingdom. What they hold within their Temples are the opposite.
They claim to be the "Holy Church," but which holy church? The real
one or the false one? Are the Pope and his Roman Church the Temple of God, or is
this the unholy Temple of Babylon sitting upon the seven mountains? They use the
same words, but alter them to show the true meaning they have applied: The State
is not a state; a Certificate is not a certification. The Roman Church is not
the church (ekklesia). There is the Crown of the Lord; and a Crown of that which
is not of the Lord. There is the mark and seal of the Lord God; and there are
the Marks and Seals of the false gods. All imitations appear to be the genuine
article, but they are fakes.
Those who are truly seeking the genuine Kingdom of God must
allow the Lord to show them the discernment between the genuine and the
imitation. Without this discernment by the Holy Spirit, all will remain fooled
by the illusions of false deity emanating from the unholy spirits of the
Wizards. Neither shall they say, Lo here! Or, lo there! For behold, the kingdom
of God is within you. - Luke 17:21 Jesus said, "If your leaders say to you,
'Look, the (Father's) kingdom is in the sky,' then the birds of the sky will
precede you. If they say to you, 'It is in the sea,' then the fish will precede
you. Rather, the FATHER'S kingdom is within you and it is outside you.
Gospel of Thomas 3 Don't you know that you are the temple of God, and that the
Spirit of God lives in you? 1 Corinthians 3:16 Jesus said, "Know what
is in front of your face, and what is hidden from you will be disclosed to you.
For there is nothing hidden that will not be revealed. [And there is nothing
buried that will not be raised."] Gospel of Thomas 5
Wisdom And Freedom produced
by WORLD NEWSSTAND
Copyright © 2002. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
page image by Terri Williams
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:20:31 -0500
From: "teddy" <edward@gnosis.com>
Subject: Corporations as PsychoPaths...Narcissism Revisited
Could this be the greater perpetuator of narcissism than
the 'masses'?
BY TED NACE
From the thump of a bureaucratic stamp that brings it into
existence, every corporation by definition enjoys the status of legal personhood
that Dred Scott could only dream of. As one T-shirt slogan puts it, Slavery is
the legal fiction that a person is property. The corporation is the legal
fiction that property is a person. Corporate personhood traces back to the
invention of corporations in Britain in the 1500s. What's new in the past
century is that courts have extended the idea of personhood considerably further
than mere legal recognition, adding various Bill of Rights protections such as
freedom of speech (thus thwarting campaign finance reform laws), the right to
privacy (frustrating government safety inspectors), and so on.
Of course, none of these entries was conceived as a way of
diagnosing an institution. But Bakan finds a trait-by-trait match between the
standard actions of corporations and the diagnostic criteria of a psychopath.
Like the classic psychopath, corporations are singularly self-interested, driven
solely by the profit motive. They're manipulative, even toward children. And
they're shallow in their relationships, laying off workers and wasting
communities, incapable of remorse or empathy toward those they hurt.
When breaking laws such as pollution controls appears to
cost less than obeying such laws, they routinely do so. But wait. Isn't Bakan
being a bit too harsh? What about the symphonies and libraries funded by
corporations? The scholarships, homeless shelters, public radio shows? Bakan
doesn't deny that most corporations have embraced the practice of doing good
works. But he cites two key legal cases to explain what corporate responsibility
really means.
But the wary reader need not fear the occasional foray into
legal theory. Bakan is a first-rate storyteller, and his tales are compelling
and even hair-raising. One such story well documented but certainly not found
in high school textbooks concerns the attempt by a group of Wall Street
businessmen to organize a fascist takeover of the United States government in
1933. The plot, a reaction to Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, collapsed after
being exposed by Gen. Smedley Butler, the Marine hero the group had recruited to
handle the coups military aspects.
Turning to the present, Bakan sees an even worse threat in
the steady seepage of corporate values into the smallest, most intimate spaces
of culture. He describes the Nag Factor, a marketing strategy based on careful
studies of the ways children cajole parents into buying products. There is the
persistent whine, effective with indulgers. Or the nag with importance,
effective with parents who want a good reason for buying something for their
child.
To some, the fact that highly educated marketing
professionals are spending their days crafting ad campaigns that attempt to
match the right sort of nag to the right sort of parent may seem more an
annoyance than a threat. But to Bakan, such examples of moral autism, multiplied
through every relationship and across every level of society, are hollowing out
the very core of civilization.
Ted Nace is the author of GANGS OF AMERICA: The Rise of
Corporate Power and the Disabling of Democracy (Berrett-Koehler, 2003).
BACK to Kolven
BACK to Come out